public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/13680] New: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options
@ 2004-01-14 11:12 mike_lange at despammed dot com
  2004-01-14 16:21 ` [Bug other/13680] " schwab at suse dot de
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mike_lange at despammed dot com @ 2004-01-14 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

> gcc --y 
gcc: no input files

> gcc -y 
gcc: unrecognized option `-y'
gcc: no input files

-- 
           Summary: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: other
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: mike_lange at despammed dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13680


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/13680] gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options
  2004-01-14 11:12 [Bug other/13680] New: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options mike_lange at despammed dot com
@ 2004-01-14 16:21 ` schwab at suse dot de
  2004-01-14 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-01-14 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2004-01-14 16:21 -------
"--foo" is equivalent to "-ffoo".  The meaning of -f options depends on the 
language to compile, which depends on the name of the input file. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13680


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/13680] gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options
  2004-01-14 11:12 [Bug other/13680] New: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options mike_lange at despammed dot com
  2004-01-14 16:21 ` [Bug other/13680] " schwab at suse dot de
@ 2004-01-14 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-14 18:22 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-14 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-14 17:37 -------
Invalid as  Andreas said already.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13680


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/13680] gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options
  2004-01-14 11:12 [Bug other/13680] New: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options mike_lange at despammed dot com
  2004-01-14 16:21 ` [Bug other/13680] " schwab at suse dot de
  2004-01-14 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-14 18:22 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com
  2004-01-14 18:24 ` [Bug driver/13680] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-14 18:51 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mike_lange at despammed dot com @ 2004-01-14 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mike_lange at despammed dot com  2004-01-14 18:22 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> "--foo" is equivalent to "-ffoo".  The meaning of -f options depends on the 
> language to compile, which depends on the name of the input file. 

gcc -c test.c -o test.o
gcc --y --blahhh -fuhhhh test.o -o test

[test.c is some valid c-code]

So, I'd say gcc ignores illegal double-dash(or -f..) command line options *if* 
the input file is named test.o!




-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13680


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/13680] gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options
  2004-01-14 11:12 [Bug other/13680] New: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options mike_lange at despammed dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-01-14 18:22 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com
@ 2004-01-14 18:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-14 18:51 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-14 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-14 18:24 -------
the -f* flags (aka --*) get only passed to the real compiles, when the input file *.o that file gets 
passed to linker so the -f* flags do not get passed on.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
          Component|other                       |driver
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13680


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug driver/13680] gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options
  2004-01-14 11:12 [Bug other/13680] New: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options mike_lange at despammed dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-01-14 18:24 ` [Bug driver/13680] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-14 18:51 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mike_lange at despammed dot com @ 2004-01-14 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mike_lange at despammed dot com  2004-01-14 18:51 -------
So, this bug is impossible to fix, right?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13680


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-14 18:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-14 11:12 [Bug other/13680] New: gcc ignores illegal double-dash command line options mike_lange at despammed dot com
2004-01-14 16:21 ` [Bug other/13680] " schwab at suse dot de
2004-01-14 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-14 18:22 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com
2004-01-14 18:24 ` [Bug driver/13680] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-14 18:51 ` mike_lange at despammed dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).