From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2099 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2004 17:33:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2083 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2004 17:33:20 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040116173320.2080.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/12419] [3.3/3.4 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01887.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-16 17:33 ------- Eric, why do you say this is related to opt/13424? AFAICS the patch there relates only to constructors. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12419