From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23870 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2004 18:12:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23863 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2004 18:12:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040116181249.23862.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040114165645.13683.giovannibajo@libero.it> References: <20040114165645.13683.giovannibajo@libero.it> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13683] [3.3/3.4 Regression] bogus warning about passing non-PODs through ellipsis X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01895.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-16 18:12 ------- I believe that it's reasonable to issue a warning about the code in question, despite the fact that the code appears as the operand to a sizeof. Givoanni, if you disagree, please raise the issue with Jason. If you both agree that this really is a problem, reopen this PR. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13683