public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
@ 2003-11-06 20:17 bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:18 ` [Bug optimization/12928] " bbooth at redhat dot com
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bbooth at redhat dot com @ 2003-11-06 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
Summary: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling
glibc
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bbooth at redhat dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC version:
gcc (GCC) 3.5-tree-ssa 20031106 (merged 20031026)
GCC configure options:
--prefix=/notnfs/bbooth/tree-ssa/i686/inst
--srcdir=/notnfs/bbooth/tree-ssa/gcc
--disable-multilib
Command line & compiler/assembler output:
/notnfs/bbooth/tree-ssa/i686/inst/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/cc1
-fpreprocessed sigsuspend.i -quiet -dumpbase sigsuspend.c -mtune=pentiumpro
-auxbase-strip /home/bbooth/tree-ssa/build/i686/GLIBC/signal/sigsuspend.o -O2
-Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -version -ftime-report -o
sigsuspend.s
GNU C version 3.5-tree-ssa 20031106 (merged 20031026) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 3.5-tree-ssa 20031106 (merged 20031026).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Execution times (seconds)
lexical analysis : 0.01 (14%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 (11%) wall
parser : 0.02 (29%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 (22%) wall
tree gimplify : 0.01 (14%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 (11%) wall
bypass jumps : 0.01 (14%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 (11%) wall
symout : 0.01 (14%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 (11%) wall
TOTAL : 0.07 0.02 0.09
as -V -Qy -o /home/bbooth/tree-ssa/build/i686/GLIBC/signal/sigsuspend.o
sigsuspend.s
GNU assembler version 2.14.90.0.4 (i386-redhat-linux) using BFD version
2.14.90.0.4 20030523
sigsuspend.s: Assembler messages:
sigsuspend.s:83: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
sigsuspend.s:84: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
sigsuspend.s:87: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
==============
.i file to come.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
@ 2003-11-06 20:18 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:18 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bbooth at redhat dot com @ 2003-11-06 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
------- Additional Comments From bbooth at redhat dot com 2003-11-06 20:18 -------
Created an attachment (id=5074)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5074&action=view)
Associated .i file
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:18 ` [Bug optimization/12928] " bbooth at redhat dot com
@ 2003-11-06 20:18 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bbooth at redhat dot com @ 2003-11-06 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
------- Additional Comments From bbooth at redhat dot com 2003-11-06 20:18 -------
Created an attachment (id=5075)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5075&action=view)
The assembly code causing the errors.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:18 ` [Bug optimization/12928] " bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:18 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
@ 2003-11-06 20:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-06 20:38 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-06 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-06 20:28 -------
This is not a gcc problem from the source:
".if 1 - \\name\n\t"
Report it to glibc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-06 20:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-06 20:38 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at redhat dot com @ 2003-11-06 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2003-11-06 20:38 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced
when compiling glibc
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 15:28, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> This is not a gcc problem from the source:
> ".if 1 - \\name\n\t"
> Report it to glibc.
>
Hmm, we don't get this problem with gcc 3.2. Is this something we've
deprecated since then?
Diego.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-06 20:38 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
@ 2003-11-06 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-06 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-06 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-06 20:48 -------
I take that back, I needed to look into the asm a little more:
bpushl .L__X'$0, $0
bmovl .L__X'$0, $0
movl $72, %eax
int $0x80
bpopl .L__X'$0, $0
%k2 == $0?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-06 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-06 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-07 19:45 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-06 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-06 21:05 -------
Still valid as "C" constraint, I think glibc wanted "c" here instead (and maybe "d" instead of "D"):
Specifies constant that can be easily constructed in SSE register without loading it from memory.
>From the source:
"aCD" (0)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-06 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-07 19:45 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-07 19:46 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bbooth at redhat dot com @ 2003-11-07 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
bbooth at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
------- Additional Comments From bbooth at redhat dot com 2003-11-07 19:45 -------
What about this case...
GCC version:
gcc (GCC) 3.5-tree-ssa 20031107 (merged 20031026)
GCC configure options:
--prefix=/notnfs/bbooth/tree-ssa/x86_64/inst
--srcdir=/notnfs/bbooth/tree-ssa/gcc
--disable-multilib
Command line & compiler/assembler output:
/notnfs/bbooth/tree-ssa/x86_64/inst/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/cc1
-fpreprocessed l10nflist.i -quiet -dumpbase l10nflist.c -mtune=k8 -auxbase-strip
/home/bbooth/tree-ssa/build/x86_64/GLIBC/intl/l10nflist.o -O2 -Wall -Winline
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -std=gnu99 -version -ftime-report -o l10nflist.s
GNU C version 3.5-tree-ssa 20031107 (merged 20031026) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 3.5-tree-ssa 20031107 (merged 20031026).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Execution times (seconds)
garbage collection : 0.02 (12%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 (11%) wall
callgraph construction: 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
life analysis : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
life info update : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
alias analysis : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 (11%) wall
register scan : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
preprocessing : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 (11%) wall
lexical analysis : 0.03 (18%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
parser : 0.02 (12%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.03 (17%) wall
tree CFG construction : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
tree CFG cleanup : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
tree thread jumps : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
expand : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
CSE : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
loop analysis : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
flow analysis : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
combiner : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 6%) wall
if-conversion : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
scheduling 2 : 0.01 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
TOTAL : 0.17 0.01 0.18
as -V -Qy -o /home/bbooth/tree-ssa/build/x86_64/GLIBC/intl/l10nflist.o l10nflist.s
GNU assembler version 2.14.90.0.4 (x86_64-redhat-linux) using BFD version
2.14.90.0.4 20030523
l10nflist.s: Assembler messages:
l10nflist.s:406: Error: Incorrect register `%rax' used with `l' suffix
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-07 19:45 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
@ 2003-11-07 19:46 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-07 19:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-16 20:23 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bbooth at redhat dot com @ 2003-11-07 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
bbooth at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-07 19:46 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
@ 2003-11-07 19:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-16 20:23 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-07 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
GCC host triplet|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet| |x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-07 19:53 -------
Either a machine description problem or a miscompiling something generated from the *.md files.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug optimization/12928] [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2003-11-07 19:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-16 20:23 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-16 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-16 20:23 -------
Fixed on mainline by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01612.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-16 20:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-06 20:17 [Bug optimization/12928] New: [tree-ssa] Bad assembly code produced when compiling glibc bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:18 ` [Bug optimization/12928] " bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:18 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-06 20:38 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2003-11-06 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-06 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-07 19:45 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-07 19:46 ` bbooth at redhat dot com
2003-11-07 19:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-16 20:23 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).