From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-82426-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 590 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 11:28:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 579 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2004 11:28:03 -0000
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 11:28:00 -0000
From: "d dot binderman at virgin dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040117112758.13717.d.binderman@virgin.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/13717] New: duplicated parameter name not caught ?
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01975.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The one liner

void f( int fred, char * fred);

is IMHO illegal code because fred is the name of two parameters.

I couldn't get gcc332 to find the bug in this code.
This is salted down from real code in Fedora Core 1.

-- 
           Summary: duplicated parameter name not caught ?
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: d dot binderman at virgin dot net
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: linux-i386


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13717