public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/13768] [3.4/3.5 Regression] syntax error only when -funit-at-a-time
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040120154950.17904.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040120110040.13768.igodard@pacbell.net>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-20 15:49 -------
I need a good C++ person here but the difference happens only with -funit-at-a-time, looks like 
unit at a time is instainating different templates.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
            Summary|syntax error only when -O2  |[3.4/3.5 Regression] syntax
                   |                            |error only when -funit-at-a-
                   |                            |time
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13768


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-20 11:00 [Bug c++/13768] New: syntax error only when -O2 igodard at pacbell dot net
2004-01-20 11:01 ` [Bug c++/13768] " igodard at pacbell dot net
2004-01-20 11:02 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2004-01-20 11:03 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2004-01-20 11:05 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2004-01-20 15:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-01-20 17:18 ` [Bug optimization/13768] [3.4/3.5 Regression] -funit-at-a-time compiles unused inline function bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-21  3:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-21  5:22 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2004-01-21  7:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-21 13:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-31 18:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-03  8:39 ` [Bug c++/13768] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-03  9:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-03 11:00 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2004-02-03 15:46 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-02-03 15:53 ` jh at suse dot cz
2004-02-03 15:59 ` jh at suse dot cz
2004-02-03 16:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-03 16:04 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2004-02-03 17:22 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-02-05 17:14 ` [Bug c++/13768] C++ fails to diagnose invalid code pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-05 17:23 ` [Bug c++/13768] C++ fails to diagnose invalid code(calling a non exitsing function in a template class) in non unit-at-a-time mode giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-02-05 20:04 ` [Bug c++/13768] Incoherent behaviour in instantiation between -funit-at-a-time and -fno-unit-at-a-time igodard at pacbell dot net
2004-05-05 20:25 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-03  6:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040120154950.17904.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).