From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1519 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 18:57:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1512 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jan 2004 18:57:40 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040120185740.1511.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "kgardas at objectsecurity dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> References: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13776] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 in comparison with 3.4.0 040114 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02441.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2004-01-20 18:57 ------- Sorry, I don't understand -- this bugreport is about regression in 3.5-tree-ssa, while 13775 is about regression in 3.4.0. I've thought they should be different bugreports for different set of people (working on different branches). Should I reopen bug in this case? Thanks, Karel -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13776