public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wilson at specifixinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/11999] illegal instruction in unwind-ia64.c
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040120214158.20884.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030820222640.11999.rscohnlkjh@netscape.net>


------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com  2004-01-20 21:41 -------
Subject: Re:  illegal instruction in unwind-ia64.c

On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:54, dhazeghi at yahoo dot com wrote:
> Can we close this now that Jakub has committed his patch? Thanks.

There is still an assembler bug that needs to be fixed, and no binutils
bug database I can register it in, so there would be some use in keeping
the bug report open so that we don't forget about the assembler bug.  I
asked HJ if he could look at the assembler bug, and he put it on his
list of things to look at.  He hasn't gotten to it yet.

This shouldn't be holding up the gcc-3.4 release though.  The version
could be changed to 3.5 if that helps, and the priority could be
lowered.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11999


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-20 22:26 [Bug c/11999] New: illegal instruction in libunwind-ia64.c rscohnlkjh at netscape dot net
2003-08-20 22:30 ` [Bug target/11999] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-21 14:35 ` [Bug target/11999] illegal instruction in unwind-ia64.c pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-22 18:59 ` rscohnlkjh at netscape dot net
2003-08-22 19:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-23  1:25 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-12-09 23:58 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-12-11  8:29 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-12-11  8:58 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2003-12-11  9:15 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-12-11 18:40 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2004-01-19 20:54 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2004-01-20 21:41 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com [this message]
2004-01-21  1:00 ` [Bug target/11999] [binutils bug] illegal instruction in unwind-ia64.c accepts by gas dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2004-05-29 14:41 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040120214158.20884.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).