From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23439 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2004 07:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23430 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2004 07:23:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040121072300.23429.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031223020924.13472.p.van-hoof@qub.ac.uk> References: <20031223020924.13472.p.van-hoof@qub.ac.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13472] [3.3 Regression] optimizer generates code to store data in const int, resulting in a segfault X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02553.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-21 07:22 ------- No, I don't want to apply it until the branch has fully recovered from its January chaos. This patch 2004-01-16 Jan Hubicka PR opt/11350 * cfgcleanup.c (try_optimize_cfg): Suppress tablejump removal after reload. * cfgrtl.c (try_redirect_by_replacing_branch): Likewise. caused a disaster on mainline on anything else than x86. This patch 2004-01-15 J"orn Rennecke PR optimization/10392 * reload.c (can_reload_into): New function. (push_reload): Use it. should never have been put on the branch at this point. I found this patch 2004-01-09 Richard Henderson * recog.c (constrain_operands): Validate mem operands. very risky too. So don't count on me to put a patch to reload on the branch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13472