From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2621 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2004 20:31:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2613 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2004 20:31:33 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:31:00 -0000 From: "tm at kloo dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <20040121203130.13798.tm@kloo.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13798] New: 10x compile time regression X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02671.txt.bz2 List-Id: Here are the compile times for imdecode.i (from stress-1.17) using the options -O2 -m4 on a P2/300 with 128 megs of RAM: tree-ssa: real 23m56.505s user 22m42.970s sys 0m11.900s mainline: real 2m9.078s user 2m5.930s sys 0m1.970s This appears to be a 10x compile time regression. Toshi -- Summary: 10x compile time regression Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tm at kloo dot net CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i386-linux GCC host triplet: i386-linux GCC target triplet: sh-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13798