From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29887 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2004 21:46:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29880 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2004 21:46:38 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040121214638.29879.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "tm at kloo dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040121203130.13798.tm@kloo.net> References: <20040121203130.13798.tm@kloo.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13798] [tree-ssa] 10x compile time regression X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02698.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tm at kloo dot net 2004-01-21 21:46 ------- The compiler OOMs when I try to use -ftime-report. However, it runs about 10 minutes before it OOMs and the peak memory usage prior to OOMing appears to be about 110 megs. So the compilation speed (or lack thereof) doesn't seem dependent on memory usage. Toshi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13798