From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-83289-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19088 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2004 21:35:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19079 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jan 2004 21:35:28 -0000
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:35:00 -0000
From: "kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040122213522.13820.kcook@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/13820] New: [3.3 Regression] A GCC release tarball can no longer be built without bison/flex
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02838.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

I just noticed that changing the *.dvi files to be built in the doc directory
has caused a regression.  This occurs on mainline and the 3.4 branch

To recreate:

../gcc-srcdir/configure
make configure-gcc
cd gcc
make dvi

The problem is the texi2dvi (at least the version that comes with texinfo 4.2)
does not appear to work with include directories with relative path names and
the rules for making dvi files refers to $(docdir) which is defined as
$(srcdir)/doc.
$(srcdir) is a relative path name.

On the plus side I think this is easy to fix and a patch will be forthcoming
within the day

-- 
           Summary: [3.3 Regression] A GCC release tarball can no longer be
                    built without bison/flex
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13820