From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6548 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2004 03:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6521 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jan 2004 03:00:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040123030005.6519.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040123024842.13824.tromey@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040123024842.13824.tromey@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/13824] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] gcj SEGV with simple .java program X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02878.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-23 03:00 ------- Confirmed for 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5, this is a regression from 3.2.3. The problem is in unsafe_for_reeval somehow with a tree of LABELED_BLOCK_EXPR. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |critical Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-01-23 03:00:04 date| | Summary|gcj SEGV with simple .java |[3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] gcj |program |SEGV with simple .java | |program Target Milestone|--- |3.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13824