From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29112 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2004 16:58:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29080 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jan 2004 16:58:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040123165811.29079.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com> References: <20021002075601.8126.o.lauffenburger@topsolid.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/8126] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] Floating point computation far slower in 3.2 than in 2.95 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02946.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2004-01-23 16:58 ------- Are you currently working on this Jan, or should we unassign it? Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8126