From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-83480-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13831 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2004 00:04:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13800 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2004 00:04:48 -0000
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040124000448.13797.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "schwab at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040117230657.13722.schwab@suse.de>
References: <20040117230657.13722.schwab@suse.de>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/13722] [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg03029.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2004-01-24 00:04 -------
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix

"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

> So, if you wouldn't mind trying the appended revision (changes only
> ia64.c)?

Does that mean that the changes in ia64.md from pr13722.diff should be
backed out?

Andreas.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13722