public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/13857] New: nested namespaces error msg
@ 2004-01-25 15:43 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-01-25 15:55 ` [Bug c++/13857] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2004-01-25 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/229088]
seen in 3.3.3 and 3.4 CVS
In this example the error message mentions the wrong namespace:
namespace outer { namespace inner { void foo(); } }
void outer::foo()
{
// error: `void outer::foo()' should have been declared inside `outer'
}
--
Summary: nested namespaces error msg
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13857
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13857] nested namespaces error msg
2004-01-25 15:43 [Bug c++/13857] New: nested namespaces error msg debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-01-25 15:55 ` [Bug c++/13857] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2004-01-25 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-25 16:00 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 16:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-25 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-25 15:55 -------
Confirmed but not a regression.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-01-25 15:55:10
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13857
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13857] nested namespaces error msg
2004-01-25 15:43 [Bug c++/13857] New: nested namespaces error msg debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2004-01-25 15:55 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2004-01-25 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-25 15:55 -------
Subject: Re: New: nested namespaces error msg
"debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| [forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/229088]
|
| seen in 3.3.3 and 3.4 CVS
|
| In this example the error message mentions the wrong namespace:
|
|
| namespace outer { namespace inner { void foo(); } }
|
| void outer::foo()
| {
| // error: `void outer::foo()' should have been declared inside `outer'
| }
I don't understand this report. As far as I can tell, the error
message is correct. You cannot define something as being part of a
namespace (using a qualified-id) if it wasn't previously declared
there. You can perfectly have outer::foo and outer::inner::foo.
The compiler is not telepathic.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13857
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13857] nested namespaces error msg
2004-01-25 15:43 [Bug c++/13857] New: nested namespaces error msg debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-01-25 15:55 ` [Bug c++/13857] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-25 16:00 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 16:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2004-01-25 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-25 16:00 -------
Subject: Re: nested namespaces error msg
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Confirmed but not a regression.
It is not even a bug.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13857
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13857] nested namespaces error msg
2004-01-25 15:43 [Bug c++/13857] New: nested namespaces error msg debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-25 16:00 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2004-01-25 16:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-25 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-25 16:04 -------
I had to reread the report but I now agree with Gaby that the error is right and there is no way for
GCC to read your mind.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13857
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-25 16:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-25 15:43 [Bug c++/13857] New: nested namespaces error msg debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2004-01-25 15:55 ` [Bug c++/13857] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-25 16:00 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 16:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).