public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/9737] [DR150] Partial template specialisation selection failure involving template parameter defaults
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040125171202.13951.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030217232600.9737.gccbugs@contacts.eelis.net>


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-01-25 17:11 -------
Jason, you proposed to keep this PR suspended because the DR was closed 
as "extension", so it might serve as a prototype implementation for the 
extension.

Would you agree in having Kriang's patch in, modified in a way that it 
basically allows it as a GCC extension (no new switch), so that the strict 
C++/98 behaviour is enforced in pedantic mode? We can later deprecate and 
remove the extension if it's not picked up by the Evolution Group (for 
instance, because of the template alias thingie).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at redhat dot com,
                   |                            |giovannibajo at libero dot
                   |                            |it
            Summary|[DR184] Partial template    |[DR150] Partial template
                   |specialisation selection    |specialisation selection
                   |failure involving template  |failure involving template
                   |parameter defaults          |parameter defaults


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9737


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-25 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20030217232600.9737.gccbugs@contacts.eelis.net>
2003-07-10 13:01 ` [Bug c++/9737] [DR184] " lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-30 14:10 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-25 17:02 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-25 17:12 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it [this message]
2004-01-25 17:24 ` [Bug c++/9737] [DR150] " gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 17:40 ` gianni at mariani dot ws
2004-01-25 18:13 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-25 18:25 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 19:28 ` gianni at mariani dot ws
2004-02-01 22:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-13 18:59 ` jens dot maurer at gmx dot net
2004-07-13 19:23 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-09-02 15:09 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-09 15:26 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-30 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 19:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-9737-5473@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-02-07 11:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-07 11:14 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-11  0:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040125171202.13951.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).