public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gianni at mariani dot ws" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/9737] [DR150] Partial template specialisation selection failure involving template parameter defaults
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040125174004.24694.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030217232600.9737.gccbugs@contacts.eelis.net>
------- Additional Comments From gianni at mariani dot ws 2004-01-25 17:40 -------
Giovanni, I'm trying to understand how Bug 13809 is related to this one. This
(Bug 9737) describes partial specializations while Bug 13809 describes a
template member function resolution in which case (as far as I can tell) the
standard is clear which template member function should resolve. This (Bug
9737) describes a template type resolution issue which (IMHO) is significantly
different. Are the resolution mechanisms different between bugs 13809 and 9737 ?
Also, in the case of Bug 13809, the compiler diagnostic messages are incorrect
becuase it reports invalid alternatives as ambiguities (AFAICT).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9737
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-25 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030217232600.9737.gccbugs@contacts.eelis.net>
2003-07-10 13:01 ` [Bug c++/9737] [DR184] " lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-30 14:10 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-25 17:02 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-25 17:12 ` [Bug c++/9737] [DR150] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-25 17:24 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 17:40 ` gianni at mariani dot ws [this message]
2004-01-25 18:13 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-25 18:25 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 19:28 ` gianni at mariani dot ws
2004-02-01 22:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-13 18:59 ` jens dot maurer at gmx dot net
2004-07-13 19:23 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-09-02 15:09 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-09 15:26 ` lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-30 16:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 19:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-9737-5473@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-02-07 11:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-07 11:14 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-11 0:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040125174004.24694.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).