* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
@ 2004-01-25 7:21 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-25 7:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-25 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-25 07:21 -------
Fixed by letting GCC know that Sun ld doesn't understand init priorities.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
2004-01-25 7:21 ` [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-25 7:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-26 13:38 ` ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-25 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
2004-01-25 7:21 ` [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-25 7:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-26 13:38 ` ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
2004-01-26 14:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu @ 2004-01-26 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu 2004-01-26 13:38 -------
Subject: Re: gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
> Resolution| |FIXED
>
> Fixed by letting GCC know that Sun ld doesn't understand init priorities.
Uh... is that really a fix?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-26 13:38 ` ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
@ 2004-01-26 14:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-02 0:36 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-26 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-26 14:15 -------
The g++.dg/special directory requires a feature not available on every platform.
The compiler provides a mean for platforms to specify that the feature is not
available for them, which I used on SPARC/Solaris with native tools. As a
consequence, the g++.dg/special directory is now skipped.
What would you want to get instead?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-26 14:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-02-02 0:36 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-02 0:38 ` ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-02 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-02 00:36 -------
I'm not objecting to your changes to the testsuite to bypass the tests. But I
don't consider that a fix for the missing feature so we shouldn't say the PR
is "fixed" or "resolved".
Ideally, someone would implement init priorities using collect2 as
described by David Miller in the audit trail.
You could certainly argue that's a low priority (no pun intended) so in the
meantime I've reopened the PR, marked it as an "enhancement" and removed 3.4.0
as a target milestone.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at libertysurf dot
| |fr
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
Target Milestone|3.4.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-02-02 0:36 ` ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-02-02 0:38 ` ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
2004-02-02 5:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-02 7:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu @ 2004-02-02 0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu 2004-02-02 00:38 -------
Subject: Re: gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
I'm not objecting to your changes to the testsuite to not run the
tests, I simply don't consider that a "fix" for the missing feature.
Ideally, someone would implement init priorities using collect2 as
described by David Miller in the audit trail.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-02-02 0:38 ` ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
@ 2004-02-02 5:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-02 7:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-02 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-02 05:29 -------
As you wish. But, given rth's comment, I doubt this will ever happen.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|wrong-code |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug target/6482] gcc-3.1 g++ testsuite failure in g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C
[not found] <20020426132600.6482.ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-02-02 5:29 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-02-02 7:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-02 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-02 07:29 -------
Suspending as it sounds like this will never get done.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread