public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
@ 2004-01-28 21:48 gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 21:49 ` [Bug c++/13902] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-28 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Compile the attached file and look at the message
for line 5. It is speaking of 'sizeof (*T)' which definitely
is wrong. I've not checked with 3.4.x or mainline but I
suspect the problem would be there too.
Oh, whether the program is well-formed or not is a different
issue (I think it is, but that needs a formal proof).
--
Summary: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13902] Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-28 21:49 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-28 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-28 21:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=5603)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5603&action=view)
Bah
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13902] Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 21:49 ` [Bug c++/13902] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-28 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 22:04 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-28 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-28 21:54 -------
The mainline gives:
pr13902.cc:5: error: `T' was not declared in this scope
pr13902.cc:9: error: conflicting declaration 'char X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::buf[(sizeof (T)
* X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::S)]'
pr13902.cc:5: error: 'X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::buf' has a previous declaration as `char
X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::buf[(<expression error> * X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::
S)]'
pr13902.cc:9: error: template definition of non-template `char X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::
buf[(sizeof (T) * X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::S)]'
While 2.95.3 to 3.3.3 gives about the same
from 2.95.3:
pr13902.cc:9: conflicting types for `char X<{anonymous template type parm}>::buf[(sizeof (T) *
X<{anonymous template type parm}>::S)]'
pr13902.cc:5: previous declaration as `char X<{anonymous template type parm}>::buf[(sizeof
((*T)) * X<{anonymous template type parm}>::S)]'
>From 3.3:
pr13902.cc:9: error: conflicting types for `char X<<anonymous template type
parameter> >::buf[(sizeof (T) * X<<anonymous template type parameter> >::S)]
'
pr13902.cc:5: error: previous declaration as `char X<<anonymous template type
parameter> >::buf[(sizeof ((*T)) * X<<anonymous template type parameter>
>::S)]'
I do not know if you would count this as fixed though, I am leaving it up to you, Gaby or someone
else.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13902] Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 21:49 ` [Bug c++/13902] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-28 22:04 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-28 22:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2004-01-28 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-28 22:04 -------
Subject: Re: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| The mainline gives:
| pr13902.cc:5: error: `T' was not declared in this scope
| pr13902.cc:9: error: conflicting declaration 'char X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::buf[(sizeof (T)
| * X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::S)]'
| pr13902.cc:5: error: 'X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::buf' has a previous declaration as `char
| X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::buf[(<expression error> * X< <template-parameter-1-1> >::
| S)]'
[...]
| I do not know if you would count this as fixed though, I am leaving
| it up to you, Gaby or someone else.
Thanks for the quick testing. I made an error: the template parameter
should not be missing. E.g. the testcase should have been
template<class T>
struct X {
enum { S = 8};
static char buf[sizeof (T) * S];
};
template<class T>
char X<T>::buf[sizeof (T) * X<T>::S];
With this corrected version, the code is still rejected.
Sorry for the confusion.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13902] Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-28 22:04 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2004-01-28 22:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 22:17 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-28 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-28 22:13 -------
On the mainline this is accepted, I have not looked to see which is correct though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13902] Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-28 22:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-28 22:17 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-28 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 23:25 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2004-01-28 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-28 22:17 -------
Subject: Re: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| On the mainline this is accepted, I have not looked to see which is
| correct though.
The code is well-formed. So are you saying that 3.3 and 3.4 reject
it while mainline accepts?
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13902] Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-28 22:17 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
@ 2004-01-28 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 23:25 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-28 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-28 22:22 -------
I just checked 3.4.0 also and it is accepted, the change happened when the new parser went in. So
if I understand this correctly this is fixed for 3.4.0, right?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13902] Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-28 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-28 23:25 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2004-01-28 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-01-28 23:25 -------
Subject: Re: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| I just checked 3.4.0 also and it is accepted, the change happened
| when the new parser went in. So if I understand this correctly this
| is fixed for 3.4.0, right?
Yes. Thanks a lot for your detective work.
I agree with your resolution.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13902
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-28 23:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-28 21:48 [Bug c++/13902] New: Misleading diagnostic for static data member definition gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 21:49 ` [Bug c++/13902] " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 22:04 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-28 22:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 22:17 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-28 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 23:25 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).