From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27698 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2004 11:29:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27679 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2004 11:29:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040129112955.27676.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "kgardas at objectsecurity dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040120183448.13775.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> References: <20040120183448.13775.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13775] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.4.0 in comparison with 3.3.2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg03744.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2004-01-29 11:29 ------- I have retested with the recent tree and results are provided here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-01/msg02173.html The overall impression is very good, but still some interesting regressions are presented. Cheers, Karel -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13775