From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21020 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2004 16:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21005 invoked by uid 48); 2 Feb 2004 16:59:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040202165928.21004.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040112101346.13653.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20040112101346.13653.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13653] [3.3 regression] -O2 -funroll-loop miscompiles POOMA testcase X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-02 16:59 ------- I'm afraid the result of the regression hunt doesn't help either. :-( I used today's 3.3 branch, reverted both patches, and I still get a crash with "-O2 -funroll-loops" and no crash with "-O2". Well, I only made a new compiler and used today's libraries. I'll try a full bootstrap soon. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13653