From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4995 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2004 21:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4979 invoked by uid 48); 3 Feb 2004 21:25:27 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040203212527.4978.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "zack at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040125122814.13856.aj@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040125122814.13856.aj@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/13856] [3.4/3.5 Regression] hidden support broken with builtin functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-03 21:25 ------- The source code is fine. I think what needs to happen is that the various special cases for builtin functions should only apply if the builtin is still invisible (C_DECL_INVISIBLE (olddecl)) -- if it is visible, then there was a declaration in the source code, and following declarations must agree with that one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13856