From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6050 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 02:37:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5999 invoked by uid 48); 5 Feb 2004 02:37:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 02:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040205023726.5998.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030515181600.10807.giovannibajo@libero.it> References: <20030515181600.10807.giovannibajo@libero.it> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/10807] [DR 295] It should be possible to cv-qualify function types, if the CV qualifications are introduced through a typedef or a template argument X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00574.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-05 02:37 ------- I don't think it's appropriate to qualify this as a regression since (a) the standard as it presently exists does not allow the code, and (b) making this change will break existing code. We should implement DR 295 at some point, but it's certainly not release critical. I've removed the target milestone and the regression markers. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] [DR|[DR 295] It should be |295] It should be possible |possible to cv-qualify |to cv-qualify function |function types, if the CV |types, if the CV |qualifications are |qualifications are |introduced through a typedef |introduced through a typedef|or a template argument |or a template argument | Target Milestone|3.4.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10807