public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "roger at eyesopen dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/13775] [3.4/3.5 Regression] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.4.0 in comparison with 3.3.2
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 04:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040205045620.9604.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040120183448.13775.kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
------- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-02-05 04:56 -------
I've just tried compiling the indicated typecode.cc.ii with -O2 -ftime-report
on i686-pc-cygwin (3.5.0 20040131), and get very different numbers:
garbage collection : 3.80 (10%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 3.80 ( 9%) wall
life analysis : 13.26 (34%) usr 0.03 ( 2%) sys 13.33 (33%) wall
parser : 3.76 (10%) usr 0.37 (25%) sys 4.22 (10%) wall
name lookup : 2.01 ( 5%) usr 0.70 (47%) sys 2.70 ( 7%) wall
expand : 1.37 ( 4%) usr 0.01 ( 1%) sys 1.39 ( 3%) wall
CSE : 1.70 ( 4%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 1.70 ( 4%) wall
global alloc : 3.03 ( 8%) usr 0.02 ( 1%) sys 3.06 ( 8%) wall
TOTAL : 38.64 1.50 40.30
I'll try on x86/Linux, but if RTL expansion is a problem, its target dependent.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13775
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-05 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-20 18:34 [Bug c++/13775] New: " kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-01-20 18:52 ` [Bug c++/13775] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-20 18:53 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-23 13:26 ` mattyt-bugzilla at tpg dot com dot au
2004-01-23 23:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-24 3:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 17:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28 18:01 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-01-28 18:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-29 11:29 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-01-29 15:17 ` [Bug optimization/13775] [3.4/3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-30 19:25 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2004-01-30 21:15 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-02-04 16:38 ` [Bug middle-end/13775] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-05 4:56 ` roger at eyesopen dot com [this message]
2004-03-13 16:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040205045620.9604.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).