From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9302 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 21:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9286 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 21:42:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040205214255.9285.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040119221419.13750.ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> References: <20040119221419.13750.ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/13750] [3.4/3.5 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX: b_gnat[1b].o comparison failure X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00670.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-02-05 21:42 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX: b_gnat[1b].o comparison failure ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-02-05 21:32 ------- > Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX: b_gnat[1b].o comparison failure > > He declared, in Comment #7, that he cannot work on the problem (not having > GNAT and access to a Tru64 UNIX system), but didn't object to reverting > the patch. If the patch is reverted, then Geoff has an obligation to find an alternate fix for the underlying PCH problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13750