From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31473 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 22:08:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31451 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 22:08:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040205220823.31450.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040119221419.13750.ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> References: <20040119221419.13750.ro@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/13750] [3.4/3.5 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX: b_gnat[1b].o comparison failure X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-02-05 22:08 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX: b_gnat[1b].o comparison failure > This whole discussion is silly. I disbelieve that there is no-one who has access to the appropriate > hardware and software to properly investigate the bug. Rainer, why can't you debug it? I can try, but I'll certainly need a lot of guidance. I got the impression that nobody really cared about this regression. Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13750