* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
@ 2003-06-08 5:47 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-07-03 20:23 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-06-08 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-08 05:47:01
date| |
Version|unknown |3.3
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com 2003-06-08 05:47 -------
Confirmed. Looks like this just missed the bugzilla merge, so it got marked unconfirmed...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
2003-06-08 5:47 ` [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-07-03 20:23 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-03 20:25 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: toon at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-03 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
toon at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From toon at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-03 20:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=4340)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4340&action=view)
Proposed patch for this bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
2003-06-08 5:47 ` [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-07-03 20:23 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-03 20:25 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-20 20:55 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: toon at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-03 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
toon at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
------- Additional Comments From toon at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-03 20:25 -------
Patch sent the 7th of June; bug report is in "waiting for feedback" status.
Cheers,
Toon Moene.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-03 20:25 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-20 20:55 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-21 16:42 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-07-20 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2003-06-08 05:47:01 |2003-07-20 20:55:21
date| |
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-20 20:55 -------
Should not be in waiting as the bug exists and just waiting for approval of the patch, not
waiting for some feedback.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-20 20:55 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2003-07-21 16:42 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-24 19:04 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: toon at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-21 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
toon at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
------- Additional Comments From toon at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-21 16:42 -------
No, it is really WAITING.
I sent the patch off to the originators of this bug report (who didn't report
via bugzilla, hence you do not see their names).
I am now waiting for their feedback. To test this patch on their problem,
you have to have access to a 4 Gb RAM 64 bit machine, and as I didn't win
one of the Itania offered at the last GCC Summit, I can't do it myself ;-)
Toon Moene.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-21 16:42 ` toon at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-08-24 19:04 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-10-24 17:03 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-08-24 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-08-24 19:04 -------
Toon, any news on this one?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2003-08-24 19:04 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-10-24 17:03 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-12-01 0:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2003-10-24 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-10-24 17:01 -------
Any news on this report? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-24 17:03 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2003-12-01 0:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-17 22:58 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-01 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-01 00:26 -------
Toon, any news back from them?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2003-07-20 20:55:21 |2003-12-01 00:26:43
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2003-12-01 0:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-17 22:58 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2004-02-06 1:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com @ 2004-01-17 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2004-01-17 22:58 -------
Ehrm, it would be really nice to know if anything happened here or not? Thanks.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-17 22:58 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
@ 2004-02-06 1:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-22 7:32 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-25 0:47 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-06 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-02-06 1:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-22 7:32 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-25 0:47 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-22 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-22 07:32 -------
Toon, people have been asking for feedback on this since July last year. Any
news on this? If not, I'll close this bug under the ">3 months in WAITING
state" rule.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [Bug libf2c/10885] On 64-bit targets one can write >2Gb records in sequential files, but not in direct access files
[not found] <20030520203600.10885.toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-22 7:32 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-25 0:47 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-25 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-25 00:47 -------
While a patch for this bug is pending, it has been a lot more than
three months since feedback was asked for, and there has been no
response.
Also, the maintainer has not responded to a number of requests for
a status update for this bug. So I'm closing this bug report for
now as WONTFIX.
If the bug still exists, please inform us by re-opening this bug.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10885
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread