From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24175 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2004 03:56:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24161 invoked by uid 48); 6 Feb 2004 03:56:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 03:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040206035653.24160.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030615053147.11193.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20030615053147.11193.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11193] [3.4/3.5 Regression] revision 1.126 of configure.in broke pre-installed newlib builds X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00728.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-06 03:56 ------- An expert for this target needs to add a section for (e.g.) mn10300-elf to crossconfig.m4 (and as this problem does not affect all cross configurations, even some that use newlib, I've updated the Target window above). We now mandate that all crosses be named explicitly in crossconfig.m4 due to past issues. The only unfortunate factor is that this is not reported until the secondary configuration steps after gcc bootstraps... As we now consider this working as expected (i.e. the error is reporting the true state of affairs), marking as WONTFIX (mirrors Benjamin's comments in thread). -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED GCC target triplet|(any newlib target, e.g. |(any not named in |most *-*-elf) |crossconfig.m4) Resolution| |WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11193