From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-85229-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28731 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2004 09:57:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28723 invoked by uid 48); 6 Feb 2004 09:57:49 -0000
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040206095749.28722.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040206045704.14039.jsiek@osl.iu.edu>
References: <20040206045704.14039.jsiek@osl.iu.edu>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/14039] bug in std::find
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00752.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-02-06 09:57 -------
... but, isn't the standard a little misleading when, in 25.1.2, p2 talks about
*i == value? I think that the problem stems from the implementors (too) closely 
following 25.1.2, p2!

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14039