public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/14061] poor performance of std::sort on large lexicographic c-string sort
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 08:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040207083719.15951.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040207080740.14061.ctsa@u.washington.edu>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-02-07 08:37 -------
I know that this is a performance bug but note the C++ standard says this:
Complexity: Approximately N log N (where N ==last-first) comparisons on the "average".
If the worst case behavior is important stable_sort()(25.3.1.2) or partial_sort()(25.3.1.3) should be used. 

And note that stable_sort is faster than both quick_sort and std::sort in your case which you give.
Also note that the only complexity is needed to O(N log N) compares on average and so this is not 
comforming issue.

Confirmed that std::sort is much slower than quick_sort and std::stable_sort in the case you gave, note 
it might be faster in other cases though.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
      Known to fail|                            |tree-ssa
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-02-07 08:37:18
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14061


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-07  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-07  8:07 [Bug libstdc++/14061] New: " ctsa at u dot washington dot edu
2004-02-07  8:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-02-07 16:03 ` [Bug libstdc++/14061] " pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-02-07 22:09 ` ctsa at u dot washington dot edu
     [not found] <bug-14061-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-03-27 18:10 ` jdcoxm3 at hotmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040207083719.15951.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).