From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19777 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2004 10:52:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19769 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2004 10:52:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040209105234.19768.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "segher at kernel dot crashing dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040206074537.14042.tjw@omnigroup.com> References: <20040206074537.14042.tjw@omnigroup.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14042] C++ abstraction penalty is high in simple cases X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00992.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From segher at kernel dot crashing dot org 2004-02-09 10:52 ------- Erm, yeah. Need more coffee. Or learn C++. I'll take the coffee ;-) Maybe the compiler decided it doesn't need the temporaries s1, s2 and uses insP1,2 directly? I can't really tell from the code, without seeing the loop setup etc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14042