From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2808 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2004 14:22:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2799 invoked by uid 48); 10 Feb 2004 14:22:37 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040210142237.2798.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040209093043.14078.peturr02@ru.is> References: <20040209093043.14078.peturr02@ru.is> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/14078] Manipulators are slow X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg01120.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-02-10 14:22 ------- Paolo, does the optimization problem here looks *exactly* like PR3713? Otherwise, can you distill a small testcase showing which code construct in v3 blocks the inlining? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giovannibajo at libero dot | |it http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14078