From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27577 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2004 00:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27567 invoked by uid 48); 12 Feb 2004 00:03:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 00:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040212000301.27566.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bdavis9659 at comcast dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031030122711.12839.jv244@cam.ac.uk> References: <20031030122711.12839.jv244@cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/12839] [gfortran] incorrect IO of Inf X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg01268.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2004-02-12 00:02 ------- Is this mandated by the F90 standard or just "convention" ? looking at gcc/libgfortran/io/write.c; the field is all "+" for pos infinity, all "-" for neg infinity, and "Nan" for the other case. So, it was a very explicit decision when this code was written. If it is not required by the standard, perhaps this is not a bug and just needs to be explained in the info page. regards, bud davis -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12839