From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4915 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 16:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4897 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2004 16:17:33 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040216161733.4896.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "rrt at sc3d dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040216142656.14158.rrt@sc3d.org> References: <20040216142656.14158.rrt@sc3d.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14158] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Typo in G++ manual X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg01651.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rrt at sc3d dot org 2004-02-16 16:17 ------- "[sic]" can also be used to indicate that you really *meant* something (as opposed to you're just quoting an error). Makes sense if you think about the Latin. But given that you talk about "template templates" a lot, forget it. I just wondered through this bit of the docs, and don't regularly use C++. Sorry for the noise. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14158