From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7750 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 17:52:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7734 invoked by uid 48); 17 Feb 2004 17:52:55 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040217175255.7733.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040217171044.14179.debora.j.estey@lmco.com> References: <20040217171044.14179.debora.j.estey@lmco.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14179] out of memory X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg01736.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-02-17 17:52 ------- Debora, Your problem is that G++ needs more RAM to be able to compile that file. Lately, there has been a lot of work on making the C++ compiler consumes less and less memory, and on making on faster, but this is work cannot be backported into the 3.3 stable release serie. Currently G++ 3.4.0 compiles faster than 2.95 on most tests, and consumes around the same amount of memory. I would suggest you to try again upgrading your compiler to 3.4.0. You will have to pull it from CVS and recompile it. Also, you may want to take a look at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html, since the new compiler is much more strict to the C++ standard, so old code might need to be modified. If this is feasable for you, I will be looking forward to a new report from you on how 3.4.0 behaves with your code. Alas, it's probably too late to improve the 3.3 serie so much. If you really need to use it, you can probably trying adding more RAM to your computer, it should probably allow it to finish compilation. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Summary|out of memory |out of memory http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179