From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19687 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2004 08:22:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19669 invoked by uid 48); 20 Feb 2004 08:22:14 -0000 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040220082214.19668.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040219054655.14207.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040219054655.14207.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/14207] [3.4 Regression] Bootstrap fails linking libstdc++.so for -mabi-o32 ABI X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg01982.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-02-20 08:22 ------- A comment: of course I have no problem with you reverting this straighforward improvement from the 3_4-branch for the sake of stability. However, I think you agree that something is seriously wrong with the port or its toolchain if changing an 'if' like that (simplifying it, actually!) breaks the bootstrap!?!?! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14207