From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24326 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2004 02:38:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24309 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2004 02:38:10 -0000 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040225023810.24308.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040225013703.14283.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040225013703.14283.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14283] [3.5 regression] ICE in cp_parser_parse_and_diagnose_invalid_type_name X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg02360.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-02-25 02:38 ------- Well, basically I can see an ICE on invalid with this: ----------------------------- struct A {}; template struct C { typedef A::template INVALID X; }; ----------------------------- The ice-on-valid would disappear if the underlying rejects-valid were fixed. I keep forgetting that a TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR is just a syntactic tree. Caused by my patch, I'll fix this as soon as I am done with the 3.4 regressions. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |giovannibajo at libero dot |dot org |it Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed| |1 Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code Known to fail| |3.5.0 Known to work| |3.4.0 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-02-25 02:38:09 date| | Target Milestone|3.5.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14283