public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dnovillo at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14272] [tree-ssa] miscompilation of __exchange_and_add (atomicity.h) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:53:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040225195300.19200.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20040224133459.14272.ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de> ------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-02-25 19:52 ------- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] miscompilation of __exchange_and_add (atomicity.h) On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 13:20, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From amacleod at redhat dot com 2004-02-25 18:20 ------- > Err, did you try that patch on a testsuite run? > Nope. I only checked that it fixed this specific problem. I didn't mean to apply the patch until you checked it out. > It seems to me that you still need to look through the operands and kill any > active partition experssions which are dependent on the uses and defs. Ie, you > wouldn't make anything replaceable, but you do need to remove things from the > current search list. > Yes, I had the feeling that it was a bit heavy handed. Diego. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14272
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 19:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-02-24 13:35 [Bug c/14272] New: " ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-02-24 14:26 ` [Bug optimization/14272] [tree-ssa] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-24 14:48 ` ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-02-25 12:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-25 13:32 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-25 13:43 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-25 14:02 ` Christian Ehrhardt 2004-02-25 14:02 ` ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-02-25 14:06 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2004-02-25 14:08 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-02-25 18:06 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-02-25 18:20 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2004-02-25 19:53 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com [this message] 2004-02-25 19:54 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-02-26 10:19 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-26 13:07 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-26 14:56 ` ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-02-26 14:59 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2004-02-26 14:59 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-02-26 15:00 ` ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-02-26 15:02 ` ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-02-26 15:15 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2004-02-26 15:43 ` ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040225195300.19200.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).