From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21772 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2004 16:48:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21765 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2004 16:48:36 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040226164836.21762.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "dnovillo at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040226153737.14307.ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de> References: <20040226153737.14307.ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/14307] [tree-ssa] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg (explow.c:675) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg02529.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-02-26 16:48 ------- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg (explow.c:675) On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:46, ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-02-26 16:46 ------- > Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg (explow.c:675) > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:50:12PM -0000, dnovillo at redhat dot com wrote: > > Do you still get the error if you build cc1plus with the system > > compiler? > > If I compile a fresh non bootstrapped cc1plus with the host compiler > (gcc-3.2) it ICEs with and without Andrew's patch, i.e. these failures > are not related to Andrew's patch (as I already suggested in PR 14272). > Then this may be a problem we inherited from mainline at the last merge. I'm working on another mainline merge. I'll see if this makes it go away. If it doesn't, we may be having a gimplification problem. At -O0, just about the only thing we do is gimplify and expand into RTL. Diego. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14307