public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/14320] [3.4/3.5 Regression] istreambuf_iterator::difference_type is not a signed integral type
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040227145237.959.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040227134048.14320.peturr02@ru.is>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 861 bytes --]
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-02-27 14:52 -------
Hi Pétur...
Should we change streamoff itself? I think so.
Can't we basically revert for streamoff to the 3_3 situation?
Since the type is mostly implementation defined, the only tricky point seems the
constructor from fpos (which indeed, in the present form represents a "surprise"
for many people around ;), but this is only a type safety (i.e., QoI) issue.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-02-27 14:52:36
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14320
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-27 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-27 13:40 [Bug libstdc++/14320] New: " peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-02-27 13:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/14320] " peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-02-27 13:55 ` peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-02-27 13:57 ` peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-02-27 13:58 ` peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-02-27 14:00 ` peturr02 at ru dot is
2004-02-27 14:52 ` pcarlini at suse dot de [this message]
2004-02-27 15:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-02-27 17:54 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-02-28 3:23 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-01 22:11 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-03 0:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-04 9:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-04 9:49 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040227145237.959.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).