From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-87146-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20947 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2004 01:08:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20927 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2004 01:08:52 -0000
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:08:00 -0000
From: "falk at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040228010851.14329.falk@debian.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/14329] New: [tree-ssa] badly formatted warnings for SRA replacements
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg02669.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

gcc version 3.5-tree-ssa 20040217 (merged 20040211)

int sys_msgctl (void)
{
    struct { int mode; } setbuf;
    return setbuf.mode;
}

% gcc -O2 -Wall -c gcc_bug.c 
gcc_bug.c: In function `sys_msgctl':
gcc_bug.c:4: warning: 'setbuf$mode' is used uninitialized in this function

Very cool of SRA to recognize this, but it should really say 'setbuf.mode'.

-- 
           Summary: [tree-ssa] badly formatted warnings for SRA replacements
           Product: gcc
           Version: tree-ssa
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: falk at debian dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14329