From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13475 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2004 04:01:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13466 invoked by uid 48); 29 Feb 2004 04:01:47 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 04:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040229040147.13465.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040127051055.13875.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> References: <20040127051055.13875.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13875] [tree-ssa] missed jump thread optimization on the tree-level X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg02768.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-29 04:01 ------- Here is the simpler testcase, self-contained example: struct COST { unsigned *cost; ~COST(); }; COST::~COST() { if (cost) delete [] cost; } In fact it has nothing to do with inlining at all. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|[tree-ssa] function not |[tree-ssa] missed jump |optimized |thread optimization on the | |tree-level http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13875