From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20625 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2004 19:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20617 invoked by uid 48); 29 Feb 2004 19:45:23 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040229194523.20616.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "stl at caltech dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040229144929.14344.stl@caltech.edu> References: <20040229144929.14344.stl@caltech.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/14344] [3.3.3 Regression] MinGW Bootstrap Failure X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg02824.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From stl at caltech dot edu 2004-02-29 19:45 ------- [Gabriel Dos Reis] > Thanks for taking the time to bootstrap previous release. I don't > think it is necessary to test the prereleases (unless you have spare > cycles ;-)). Okay. Each bootstrap certainly takes a long time. > The immediate conclusion I can draw is that there is no active maintainers > for the MinGW port. >>From what I understand, people do actively maintain MinGW (one person you didn't mention is Danny Smith, who released the 3.3.3 MinGW patch set and has been active in my 3.4 bootstrap failure bug, PR12974), but the critical thing that they don't do is bootstrap MinGW routinely on MSYS, as I do. Instead they use Cygwin. Perhaps you could help figure out when and where cygming.h, which 3.3.3 seems to want, disappeared from the 3.3 branch. I looked at the CVS web interface, which didn't say anything about cygming.h being removed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14344