From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7105 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2004 21:50:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7083 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2004 21:50:11 -0000 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040301215011.7082.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "jason at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040221001620.14230.jakub@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040221001620.14230.jakub@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14230] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] ICE in cp_expr_size X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-03-01 21:50 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] ICE in cp_expr_size On 1 Mar 2004 20:37:48 -0000, "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > Jason, this looks to be another problem with your exception-handling > optimization stuff. Would you please take a look at that? For the record, cp_expr_size is not related to the EH optimization code; aborts in cp_expr_size indicate places where the compiler would otherwise silently generate a bitwise copy of a class with a constructor. But yes, I'm looking at this and the other bugs you mentioned. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14230