public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion
@ 2004-03-03 8:43 wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-03 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html page says that use of gccbug will cause your
bug report to be mailed to the bug database, but this isn't true since we
switched from GNATS/PRMS to bugzilla. It just causes it to be mailed to
gcc-bugs where it then likely gets ignored.
Similarly, the BUGS file in release tar balls says the same thing.
gcc/doc/invoke.texi recommends use of gccbug, but should not.
gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi also mentions gccbug, but it seems to be harmless.
Likewise for gcc/doc/configfiles.texi.
Perhaps we should get rid of gccbug?
--
Summary: gccbug confusion
Product: gcc
Version: 3.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-03 10:40 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk @ 2004-03-03 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-03-03 10:40 -------
Subject: Re: New: gccbug confusion
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> The http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html page says that use of gccbug will cause your
> bug report to be mailed to the bug database, but this isn't true since we
> switched from GNATS/PRMS to bugzilla. It just causes it to be mailed to
> gcc-bugs where it then likely gets ignored.
It causes it to be mailed to gcc-gnats, where the
wwwdocs/bugzilla/contrib/bug_email.pl script parses it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
@ 2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-03-03 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-03 16:15 -------
The place in invoke.texi must have been an oversight -- we purged
gccbug from bugreport.texi, I think that just nobody had any clue that
gccbug would be referenced in invoke.texi. What is it doing there anyway?
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-03 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-03 16:22 -------
gccbug still works.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
2004-03-04 1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: wilson at specifixinc dot com @ 2004-03-03 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-03-03 19:08 -------
Subject: Re: gccbug confusion
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-03 16:22 -------
> gccbug still works.
I stand corrected. My bug report was prompted by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2004-02/msg02598.html
which was sent by gccbug but did not result in a bugzilla bug report.
However, perhaps this is a SuSE specific problem. Or maybe this was
user error. I will have to ask.
There is also the issue of whether invoke.texi should recommend gccbug
or not. Wolfgang Bangerth seemed to think it shouldn't.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
@ 2004-03-04 1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2004-03-04 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dberlin at dberlin dot org 2004-03-04 01:36 -------
Subject: Re: gccbug confusion
>
> However, perhaps this is a SuSE specific problem. O
> r maybe this was
> user error. I will have to ask.
SuSE specific, AFAICT.
It sends to "feedback@suse.de", and copies to "gcc-bugs", instead of
sending to "gcc-gnats".
Thus, the email never gets parsed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-04 1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-04 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-04 21:16 -------
It was user error. The user manually added gcc-bugs to the cc line.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-03-04 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-04 22:16 -------
The place in invoke.texi where we recommend gccbug still needs to be
purged.
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-27 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-27 18:58 -------
This is for the documentation bug only.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |documentation
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-04-27 18:58:44
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-07 6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-07 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-07 01:10 -------
Subject: Bug 14402
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-07 01:10:14
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
gcc/doc : invoke.texi
Log message:
PR other/14402
* doc/invoke.texi: Don't mention gccbug.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7399&r2=2.7400
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.574&r2=1.575
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-07 6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-07 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-07 01:52 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-07 1:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-03 8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
2004-03-04 1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).