public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion
@ 2004-03-03  8:43 wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-03  8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html page says that use of gccbug will cause your
bug report to be mailed to the bug database, but this isn't true since we
switched from GNATS/PRMS to bugzilla.  It just causes it to be mailed to
gcc-bugs where it then likely gets ignored.

Similarly, the BUGS file in release tar balls says the same thing.

gcc/doc/invoke.texi recommends use of gccbug, but should not.

gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi also mentions gccbug, but it seems to be harmless.
Likewise for gcc/doc/configfiles.texi.

Perhaps we should get rid of gccbug?

-- 
           Summary: gccbug confusion
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: other
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-03 10:40 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
  2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk @ 2004-03-03 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk  2004-03-03 10:40 -------
Subject: Re:  New: gccbug confusion

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> The http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html page says that use of gccbug will cause your
> bug report to be mailed to the bug database, but this isn't true since we
> switched from GNATS/PRMS to bugzilla.  It just causes it to be mailed to
> gcc-bugs where it then likely gets ignored.

It causes it to be mailed to gcc-gnats, where the 
wwwdocs/bugzilla/contrib/bug_email.pl script parses it.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
@ 2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-03-03 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-03-03 16:15 -------
The place in invoke.texi must have been an oversight -- we purged 
gccbug from bugreport.texi, I think that just nobody had any clue that 
gccbug would be referenced in invoke.texi. What is it doing there anyway? 
 
W. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
  2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-03 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-03 16:22 -------
gccbug still works.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
  2004-03-04  1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: wilson at specifixinc dot com @ 2004-03-03 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com  2004-03-03 19:08 -------
Subject: Re:  gccbug confusion

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-03 16:22 -------
> gccbug still works.

I stand corrected.  My bug report was prompted by
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2004-02/msg02598.html
which was sent by gccbug but did not result in a bugzilla bug report.

However, perhaps this is a SuSE specific problem.  Or maybe this was 
user error.  I will have to ask.

There is also the issue of whether invoke.texi should recommend gccbug 
or not.  Wolfgang Bangerth seemed to think it shouldn't.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
@ 2004-03-04  1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
  2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2004-03-04  1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dberlin at dberlin dot org  2004-03-04 01:36 -------
Subject: Re:  gccbug confusion

>
> However, perhaps this is a SuSE specific problem.  O
> r maybe this was
> user error.  I will have to ask.

SuSE specific, AFAICT.
It sends to "feedback@suse.de", and copies to "gcc-bugs", instead of 
sending to "gcc-gnats".
Thus, the email never gets parsed.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-04  1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-04 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-04 21:16 -------
It was user error.  The user manually added gcc-bugs to the cc line.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
  2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2004-03-04 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-03-04 22:16 -------
The place in invoke.texi where we recommend gccbug still needs to be 
purged. 
 
W. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-07  6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-27 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-27 18:58 -------
This is for the documentation bug only.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |documentation
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-04-27 18:58:44
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-07  6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-07  6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-07 01:10 -------
Subject: Bug 14402

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	jsm28@gcc.gnu.org	2005-02-07 01:10:14

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog 
	gcc/doc        : invoke.texi 

Log message:
	PR other/14402
	* doc/invoke.texi: Don't mention gccbug.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7399&r2=2.7400
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.574&r2=1.575



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/14402] gccbug confusion
  2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-02-07  6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-07 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-07 01:52 -------
Fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14402


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-07  1:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-03  8:43 [Bug other/14402] New: gccbug confusion wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 10:40 ` [Bug other/14402] " jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-03-03 16:15 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-03 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 19:08 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
2004-03-04  1:36 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-04 21:16 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-04 22:16 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-27 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07  6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 10:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).