From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-88010-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22274 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2004 06:18:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22265 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2004 06:18:56 -0000
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 06:18:00 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040305061854.14440.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/14440] New: [tree-ssa] [regression] no sib calling with _Bool types
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00667.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

Here is a regression from the mainline:
_Bool t();

_Bool f(int i)
{
 return t();
}

t should be sibcalled but is not because the return type of f is really still int for some 
reason by the front-end (both the C and C++ front-ends, you have to #define _Bool bool 
for the C++ front-end to work though).

-- 
           Summary: [tree-ssa] [regression] no sib calling with _Bool types
           Product: gcc
           Version: tree-ssa
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: pessimizes-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14440