From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-88021-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17975 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2004 07:28:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17959 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2004 07:28:14 -0000
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:28:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040305072814.17958.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "relf at os2 dot ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030730175647.11729.relf@os2.ru>
References: <20030730175647.11729.relf@os2.ru>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00678.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From relf at os2 dot ru  2004-03-05 07:28 -------
I think that INVALID resolution is not suitable. In particular, it hides the
bugreport from default searching.
Reopen to mark it SUSPENDED...

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729