From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29126 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2004 14:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29111 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2004 14:56:09 -0000 Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040305145609.29110.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040106205426.13590.boris@kolpackov.net> References: <20040106205426.13590.boris@kolpackov.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13590] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] Non-existing ambiguity when inhering through virtuals two identical using declarations. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00717.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-03-05 14:56 ------- Nathan, can you raise this issue with the CWG? Maybe we can have some lights shed on this eventually. If you do that, we can suspend this bug until there is a clear position on the matter. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13590